Title Percepcija medicinskih sestra/ tehničara o korištenju umjetne inteligencije u zdravstvenom sustavu
Title (english) Perceptions of nurses/ technicians on the use of artificial intelligence in the healthcare system
Author Ana Ožeg
Mentor Ivo Dumić-Čule (mentor)
Committee member Marijana Neuberg (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee member Ivo Dumić-Čule (član povjerenstva)
Committee member Sonja Obranić (član povjerenstva)
Granter University North (University centre Varaždin) (Department of Nursing) Koprivnica
Defense date and country 2023-09-26, Croatia
Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE Clinical Medical Sciences
Abstract U zadnjih 10 godina umjetna inteligencija sve se više koristi u brojnim granama medicine. Posebno se ističe potencijal umjetne inteligencije u radiologiji, oftalmologiji, patologiji i dermatologiji, gdje postoje pretrage koje je moguće standardizirati i na taj način obraditi pomoću umjetne inteligencije. Istraživanje provedeno među zdravstvenim djelatnicima putem on-line ankete imalo je za cilj procijeniti njihovu percepciju i prihvaćanje umjetne inteligencije u medicini te spremnost na promjene koje donosi umjetna inteligencija. Rezultati su usporedili one koji su pozitivno nastrojeni prema AI-u i one koji više vjeruju ljudskoj inteligenciji. Ovo istraživanje pomaže razumjeti kako se zdravstveni sektor prilagođava novim tehnologijama.
Cilj istraživanja: ispitati prihvaćaju li medicinske sestre/ tehničari ulogu AI na njihovom radnom mjestu.
Ispitanici i metode:Za istraživanje o umjetnoj inteligenciji proveden je upitnik među medicinskim sestrama/tehničarima u Republici Hrvatskoj. Ukupno je 85 osoba odgovorilo na anketu, od kojih je 77 bilo ženskog spola, a 8 muškog spola. Najčešća dob ispitanika bila je između 30 i 39 godina.
Rezultati: 60% ispitanika nije razumjelo razliku između umjetne inteligencije i strojnog učenja. Što se tiče primjene alata temeljenih na umjetnoj inteligenciji (artificial intelligence – AI), 83,3% ispitanika nije koristilo takve alate, dok je 15,3% imalo iskustvo s njihovom uporabom. Iako 98,8% ispitanika nije sudjelovalo u projektima/istraživanjima vezanim uz AI, njih 63,5% izrazilo je interes za takve aktivnosti. 89,4% ispitanika nije prošlo obuku ili informiralo se o dostupnim tečajevima o AI. Konačno, 61,2% ispitanika podržava ideju da se AI uključi u program studija sestrinstva, dok 37,6% ne dijeli tu perspektivu. Ispitanici se najviše slažu s izjavom "AI bi mogao negativno utjecati na vašu procjenu kroz favoriziranje određenog nalaza/ishoda". Tvrdnje s kojima se sudionici većinom nisu slagali: "AI može zamijeniti kontakt s medicinskom sestrom/tehničarom", "Imam povjerenja da zdravstveno stanje mojih ukućana prati AI, uključujući i propisivanje/promjenu terapije" i "Pristao/la bih provoditi skrb o pacijentu na temelju nalaza koji je interpretirala isključivo AI bez kontrole liječnika"
Zaključak: Istraživanje ukazuje na to da nema statistički značajnih razlika s dobi sudionika i duljinom radnog staža spram stavova o AI.
Abstract (english) In the last 10 years, artificial intelligence has been increasingly used in various branches of medicine. The potential of AI stands out particularly in radiology, ophthalmology, pathology, and dermatology, where there are examinations that can be standardized and processed using artificial intelligence. Research conducted among healthcare professionals through an online survey aimed to assess their perception and acceptance of artificial intelligence in medicine, as well as their readiness for the changes brought about by artificial intelligence. The results compared those who have a positive attitude towards AI and those who have more trust in human intelligence. This research helps to understand how the healthcare sector is adapting to new technologies.
Aim of the study: To investigate whether nurses accept the role of AI in their workplace.
Subjects and methods: A questionnaire on artificial intelligence was administered to nurses/technicians in the Republic of Croatia. A total of 85 individuals responded to the survey, with 77 being female and 8 males. The most common age group among respondents was between 30 and 39 years.
Results:60% of respondents did not understand the difference between artificial intelligence and machine learning. Regarding the use of artificial intelligence-based tools, 83.3% of respondents had not used such tools, while 15.3% had experience with their use. Although 98.8% of respondents had not participated in AI-related projects/research, 63.5% expressed interest in such activities. 89.4% of respondents had not received training or information about available AI courses. Finally, 61.2% of respondents supported the idea of incorporating AI into nursing education programs, while 37.6% did not share that perspective. Participants mostly agreed with the statement "AI could negatively impact your assessment by favoring certain findings/outcomes." Statements that participants generally did not agree with include: "AI can replace interactions with a nurse/technician,""I trust that AI can monitor the health of my family members, including prescribing/changing treatment," and "I would agree to provide patient care based solely on AI-interpreted findings without physician oversight."
Conclusion: There search suggests thatt here are no statistically significant differences in participants' age and length of work experience concerning their attitudes toward AI.
Keywords
umjetna inteligencija
inteligencija
percepcija
zdravstveni sustav
napredna medicina
Keywords (english)
artificia lintelligence
intelligence
perception
healthcare system
advanced medicine
Language croatian
URN:NBN urn:nbn:hr:122:606807
Study programme Title: Nursing Study programme type: university Study level: graduate Academic / professional title: sveučilišni magistar/magistra sestrinstva (sveučilišni magistar/magistra sestrinstva)
Type of resource Text
File origin Born digital
Access conditions Open access
Terms of use
Created on 2024-10-16 09:42:26